ANALYSIS AND POLITICAL THEORY
THE WORST DEFEAT FOR EUROPE
Por: Leoncio Díaz (Politólogo)
Based on the course of events, the war in Ukraine was not about freedom or democracy but about resources and the enormous business that war represents. With this war, the Biden administration was able to boost the U.S. GDP, indebt Ukrainians for life, sell its gas to Europeans at three times its value, steal that market from Russia, ruin German industry, and, above all, relegate Europe’s geopolitical role in the world. On the other hand, Russia not only overcame economic sanctions but also revitalized its economy and opened new markets in Asia and the Middle East. It has shown strength against a hesitant Europe that hides behind Ukraine to "throw stones." Ultimately, Russia will emerge as the winner, determined to defend its sovereignty at all costs. Meanwhile, Europeans and their media, funded by USAID and loyal to their rhetorical cynicism, supported Obama and Biden’s Democrats in managing this war under the propaganda that, without supporting Ukraine, "Putin would invade them." In reality, in the medium term, they intended to invade Russia and divide it to seize the resources they lack for their survival. In a few years, they will cease to be the "First World"—or perhaps they already are not—since other countries are catching up, and the last thing they want is for a neighboring military power to develop economically, leading them to lose political influence and markets. All of this has come at the cost of the lives of millions of Ukrainians (millions, as Trump repeats), who believed the illusion of joining the European Union and that NATO would save them. To that end, they placed an overly ambitious clown as president, generously paid by the U.S., who almost succeeded in dragging Europe and the world into a prolonged war. But this comedic actor not only condemned his people to a tragedy that will take decades to recover from but also surrendered their resources and territory. His political adventure came at a high cost for Ukraine. On the other hand, NATO's role as a supplier of weapons and military training has been insignificant in changing the course of the war. Despite some gains on the battlefield, the alliance had to limit its involvement to prevent an escalation of the conflict; consequently, Ukraine's defeat also extends to them. Ultimately, they were not even invited to the peace negotiations table. "Western nations provided the weapons, and Ukrainians provided the flesh," Putin said in an interview with Western media. A direct confrontation never occurred; it has only been postponed until a new Democratic president in the U.S. pushes for another war adventure. Meanwhile, the arms race continues to accelerate, and they will invent a new excuse for war—likely, once again, with Ukraine or another Eastern European country eager to join the European Union as the battleground.
<< In the medium term, they wanted to invade Russia and divide it to take the resources they lack for their survival because, in a few years, they will cease to be the First World...>>
2025-02-19 16:23:45
Visitas: 268
The Myth of Geographical Determinism
False wealth is the belief that 'a country is rich when it has natural resources
Leer más...
TRUMP BURST THE BUBBLE OF "IDEOLOGIES."
There is no nation, government, or empire that has not negotiated with its mortal enemies when neces...
Leer más... THE WORST DEFEAT FOR EUROPE
In the medium term, they wanted to invade Russia and divide it to take the resources they lack for t...
Leer más...
How will Donald Trump's government impact geopolitics?
With Trump in office, the U.S. reorients its policy toward classic economic imperialism and internal...
Leer más...
The End of Woke Culture?
Wokism has deeply permeated the younger generations and has even influenced the older ones. I can at...
Leer más...
Why did Kamala Harris lose?
Kamala Harris had everything in her favor to win the 2024 elections: she did not go through primary ...
Leer más...
Social and work Constitutionalism: genesis of economic constitutionalism
If for the Liberal State of Law the basic idea was the category of individual, for the Social State ...
Leer más...
Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump Who won the debate?
The second presidential debate 2024 between Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris
Leer más...
WHY TAKE THE 2030 AGENDA SERIOUSLY?
The 2030 Agenda includes all those problems that today are at hand and can be solved by the great tr...
Leer más...
Michel Foucault and Byung-Chul Han en el Perú
Michel Foucault and Byung-Chul and their postulates on biopolitics and psychopolitics
Leer más...
The crisis in Haiti: multidimensional analysis of its causes, consequences and futuro
aggravated since the social outbreak of February 2019, which has become what many today describe - a...
Leer más...
Miró Quesada Rada and the political science of self-liberation
The political science of liberation is a system with diverse sources, typical of social philosophy a...
Leer más...
How did Jacques Lacan think?
For Lacan, the fundamental mechanisms of the unconscious are mechanisms of discourse, and are found ...
Leer más...
How did Jacques Lacan think?
For Lacan, the fundamental mechanisms of the unconscious are mechanisms of discourse, and are found ...
Leer más...